The Yelland Farm Wind Turbines

Turbine site
The Yelland Wind Farm site, with Yes Tor behind

The proposal was for 3 turbines, 263 feet high, with substation.
access tracks, etc. It was submitted March, 2005, by Yelland Wind Farm Ltd


These web links will tell more of the history of the proposal, from the first time it was heard about until its rejection after a Public Inquiry.

From the Dartmoor Preservation Association site, when it was submitted:
http://www.dartmoorpreservation.com/viewnews.htm?nid=27


The Public Inquiry took place in June 2006 and was then adjourned until September.  The appeal by the developers was dismissed, and the turbines refused.


After the Public Inquiry:
http://www.dartmoorpreservation.com/viewnews.htm?from=archive&nid=62&x=25&y=12

'A GOOD DAY FOR DARTMOOR'

An excerpt from the above article:

"The news was welcomed by the Dartmoor Preservation Association, the Campaign to Protect Rural England (Devon), the Manor House and Ashbury Hotels and the action group ODAT (Okehampton & Dartmoor AgainstTurbines), all of whom had supported West Devon Borough Council in defending its original decision to refuse the proposal.

"This is a good day for both Dartmoor and Okehampton," said Jonathan Cardale, Chief Executive of the DPA. "The inspector rejected the arguments that these huge turbines would have little or no effect on the Dartmoor National Park or its setting. He judged that the effects would be 'significant and severe' both when viewed from the high tors of Dartmoor and from the surrounding countryside with Dartmoor as the backdrop."

Ray Quirke, chairman of ODAT, said "We are over-joyed and extremely relieved at the news. These turbines would have blighted our lives. We are very grateful to all those who have supported us in this battle, especially the DPA. It is unfortunate that the landowner was so badly advised in the first place"

Go to the article to read more.

You can also read this comment on Geoffrey Cox`s website, link below (headlined Geoffrey Cox welcomes Yelland wind farm rejection)

http://www.geoffreycox.co.uk/search/article.php?id=217